Subscribe to the Interacoustics Academy newsletter for updates and priority access to online events

Training in ABR

ABR: dB nHL vs dB SPL

Advanced
10 mins
Reading
16 December 2021

Description

The regular ABR stimulus is in dB nHL and the masking in dB SPL. How do we know if the levels are comparative? In other words, if the AC toneburst is 40 dB nHL and the masking intensity is 45 dB SPL, how do we know how much louder the masking is than the toneburst if the units are different?

Let us try to unpack some of the issues raised by this interesting question. 

The first thing to bear in mind is that the units for masking ABR stimuli have to be in SPL – this is because a white noise masker is required to effectively mask the relatively wide bandwidth ABR stimuli (e.g. click sounds are broadband, as are CE-Chirp. Other signals like toneburst that are more frequency specific exhibit spectral splatter due to their short duration, and the bandwidth of narrow-band CE-Chirps cover several hundred Hz). Since there is no nHL (or even HL) correction for white noise the unit of level is SPL. 

The level of masking noise required depends not on comparative loudness in relation to the stimulus (which is presented to the test ear), but on the level of masker in the non-test ear required to mask out any cross-heard sound in the non-test ear. Based on the study by Lightfoot et al (2010), we know what these levels are.

Related course: Beyond the basics: Threshold ABR

 

References and caveats

Lightfoot, G., Cairns, A., and Stevens, J. (2010). Noise levels required to mask stimuli used in auditory brainstem response testing. International Journal of Audiology, 49:, pp794-798.

Presenter

Michael Maslin
After working for several years as an audiologist in the UK, Michael completed his Ph.D. in 2010 at The University of Manchester. The topic was plasticity of the human binaural auditory system. He then completed a 3-year post-doctoral research program that built directly on the underpinning work carried out during his Ph.D. In 2015, Michael joined the Interacoustics Academy, offering training and education in audiological and vestibular diagnostics worldwide. Michael now works for the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand, exploring his research interests which include electrophysiological measurement of the central auditory system, and the development of clinical protocols and clinical techniques applied in areas such as paediatric audiology and vestibular assessment and management.


Get priority access to training

Sign up to the Interacoustics Academy newsletter to be the first to hear about our latest updates and get priority access to our online events.

By signing up, I accept to receive newsletter e-mails from Interacoustics. I can withdraw my consent at any time by using the ‘unsubscribe’-function included in each e-mail.

Click here and read our privacy notice, if you want to know more about how we treat and protect your personal data.

Interacoustics - hearing and balance diagnosis and rehabilitation
Copyright © Interacoustics A/S. All rights reserved.